Browning M1917 Machine Gun
Country of Origin | United States |
Type | Machine Gun |
Caliber | 7.620 mm |
Capacity | 250 rounds |
Barrel Length | 609.000 mm |
Weight | 15.000 kg |
Rate of Fire | 500 rounds/min |
Contributor: C. Peter Chen
ww2dbaseBrowning M1917 water-cooled heavy machine guns were first seen in Apr 1917, though the concept for such a machine gun was already patented by John Browning in 1901. It was not until WW1 that the United States Army felt the need to arrange a test for this weapon design. They were quickly made the standard heavy machine guns of the US Army, although production delays meant the Browning M1917 heavy machine guns represented only a minority of all heavy machine guns of the American Expeditionary Force. Troops who used the 1,200 Browning M1917 heavy machine guns reported their satisfaction with their reliability even during sustained firing situations. The M1918 anti-aircraft variant was designed also during WW1, but they did not enter service in time for the war. Browning M1917 heavy machine guns remained in use during the interwar and WW2 periods. During WW2, in addition to being used by the US Army, many units were also given to the forces of the United Kingdom and other Allies; the British, in particular, had an acute need for Browning M1917 heavy machine guns at the onset of the European War as a large quantity of heavy machine guns were lost when the British Expeditionary Force fled from France. After the war, many Browning M1917 heavy machine guns remained in American service. The last major conflict they participated was the Korean War. During the Vietnam War, they were employed by both Americans and the South Vietnamese, but in very limited numbers as they were consider too heavy and unwieldy by that time.Variants of the Browning M1917 heavy machine guns were also built in Sweden, Poland, and Norway.
Source: Wikipedia. ww2dbase
Last Major Revision: Dec 2007
Browning M1917 Machine Gun Interactive Map
Photographs
Videos
Did you enjoy this article or find this article helpful? If so, please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $1 per month will go a long way! Thank you. Share this article with your friends: Stay updated with WW2DB: |
Visitor Submitted Comments
11 Jul 2008 03:37:33 AM
I think M1917 is not good because it need water to cool.If no water,the crew need to get water,it cost time.
All visitor submitted comments are opinions of those making the submissions and do not reflect views of WW2DB.
- » Wreck of USS Edsall Found (14 Nov 2024)
- » Autumn 2024 Fundraiser (7 Nov 2024)
- » Nobel Peace Prize for the Atomic Bomb Survivors Organization (11 Oct 2024)
- » Wreck of USS Stewart/DD-224 Found (2 Oct 2024)
- » See all news
- » 1,150 biographies
- » 337 events
- » 43,917 timeline entries
- » 1,241 ships
- » 350 aircraft models
- » 207 vehicle models
- » 375 weapon models
- » 123 historical documents
- » 260 facilities
- » 470 book reviews
- » 28,548 photos
- » 432 maps
Lt. Gen. Lewis B. "Chesty" Puller, at Guadalcanal
18 May 2008 03:08:06 AM
omg