Caption | TBF Avenger aircraft in flight, May 1942-Jun 1943 ww2dbase | ||||
Photographer | Unknown | ||||
Source | ww2dbaseUnited States Navy | ||||
More on... |
| ||||
Photo Size | 600 x 393 pixels | ||||
Added By | C. Peter Chen | ||||
Licensing | Public Domain. According to the United States copyright law (United States Code, Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105), in part, "[c]opyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government". Please contact us regarding any inaccuracies with the above information. Thank you. |
Did you enjoy this photograph or find this photograph helpful? If so, please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $1 per month will go a long way! Thank you. Share this photograph with your friends: Stay updated with WW2DB: |
Visitor Submitted Comments
2. David Stubblebine says:
9 May 2008 12:43:37 AM
Reply to Laura: My Dad flew TBM's in 1944-1945 and I've never heard this. The Avenger had something of a learning curve, to be sure (i.e., Battle of Midway), but most pilots loved the flight characteristics. Within the air groups, TBM pilots had the responsibility for navigation for the entire strike, requiring pilots to have their heads in their charts several miniutes at a time several times during the strike - this requires a fairly stable aerodynamic platform.
9 May 2008 12:43:37 AM
Reply to Laura: My Dad flew TBM's in 1944-1945 and I've never heard this. The Avenger had something of a learning curve, to be sure (i.e., Battle of Midway), but most pilots loved the flight characteristics. Within the air groups, TBM pilots had the responsibility for navigation for the entire strike, requiring pilots to have their heads in their charts several miniutes at a time several times during the strike - this requires a fairly stable aerodynamic platform.
3. Bill says:
25 Mar 2010 05:46:24 PM
Info on above photo:
TBF's in formation over Guadalcanal summer
1942.
25 Mar 2010 05:46:24 PM
Info on above photo:
TBF's in formation over Guadalcanal summer
1942.
4. Bill says:
25 Mar 2010 05:56:45 PM
The Avenger's production record during its
production run. 3/4th of all aircraft were
built by General Motors. In June, 1942, 60
were built per month by Grumman.
By the summer of 1943, GM was building 100
aircraft per month, later increased to 215
per month. Eventually building 400 per month
in 1945.
Grumman built 2,291 TBF's, GM built 7,546 TBM's
25 Mar 2010 05:56:45 PM
The Avenger's production record during its
production run. 3/4th of all aircraft were
built by General Motors. In June, 1942, 60
were built per month by Grumman.
By the summer of 1943, GM was building 100
aircraft per month, later increased to 215
per month. Eventually building 400 per month
in 1945.
Grumman built 2,291 TBF's, GM built 7,546 TBM's
5. AirforceBrat says:
2 Nov 2012 11:40:15 AM
Single radial engine'd aircraft, if trimmed properly in flight, do not roll if the pilot let go of the control column. Because of the massive torque created by its radial engine, yes, if left un-trimmed, it would would tend to roll slightly but I doubt it would do a complete roll onto its back. But to state that if the pilot let go of the controls that it would roll onto its back is Bovine Scatterings. There's a webpage that's been open since 1997 where some alleged US veteran makes this claim because he hates G. Bush 41 (G. Bush Sr.) and claims Bush jumped out of his plane when the other crewmen were left to die what he claims was a flyable aircraft. The stupidity of this claim is that a gunner in another Avenger claims that Bush parachuted with a flyable aircraft... soooo when Bush flew 45+ combat missions, why would he choose that moment to jump? Also, when in combat, how could the gunner in the other aircraft have time to stare into Bush's plane's cockpit to see what was going on? Its amazing how this guy's bogus claims have made the Avenger out to be an unstable aircraft.
Amazing how far a lie can damage all those it touches.
2 Nov 2012 11:40:15 AM
Single radial engine'd aircraft, if trimmed properly in flight, do not roll if the pilot let go of the control column. Because of the massive torque created by its radial engine, yes, if left un-trimmed, it would would tend to roll slightly but I doubt it would do a complete roll onto its back. But to state that if the pilot let go of the controls that it would roll onto its back is Bovine Scatterings. There's a webpage that's been open since 1997 where some alleged US veteran makes this claim because he hates G. Bush 41 (G. Bush Sr.) and claims Bush jumped out of his plane when the other crewmen were left to die what he claims was a flyable aircraft. The stupidity of this claim is that a gunner in another Avenger claims that Bush parachuted with a flyable aircraft... soooo when Bush flew 45+ combat missions, why would he choose that moment to jump? Also, when in combat, how could the gunner in the other aircraft have time to stare into Bush's plane's cockpit to see what was going on? Its amazing how this guy's bogus claims have made the Avenger out to be an unstable aircraft.
Amazing how far a lie can damage all those it touches.
All visitor submitted comments are opinions of those making the submissions and do not reflect views of WW2DB.
Change View
Desktop ViewSearch WW2DB
News
- » Wreck of USS Edsall Found (14 Nov 2024)
- » Autumn 2024 Fundraiser (7 Nov 2024)
- » Nobel Peace Prize for the Atomic Bomb Survivors Organization (11 Oct 2024)
- » Wreck of USS Stewart/DD-224 Found (2 Oct 2024)
- » See all news
Random Photograph
Current Site Statistics
- » 1,150 biographies
- » 337 events
- » 43,917 timeline entries
- » 1,241 ships
- » 350 aircraft models
- » 207 vehicle models
- » 374 weapon models
- » 123 historical documents
- » 260 facilities
- » 470 book reviews
- » 28,543 photos
- » 432 maps
Famous WW2 Quote
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."Winston Churchill
15 Nov 2007 07:26:44 PM
I read somewhere that the Avenger was very unstable and would roll upside down if the pilot left the controls. Anyone know if that is true?