Show Original Black and White Photograph | Show WW2DB Colorized Version
Caption | Yamakaze sinking as seen from the periscope of USS Nautilus, 25 Jun 1942, photo 2 of 2 [Colorized by WW2DB] ww2dbase | ||||
Colorization Note | This photograph was originally a black and white photograph; the colorized version presented here was a derivative work by WW2DB. The colors used in this version were speculative, and could be significantly different from the real colors. Processed using Adobe Photoshop Image Processor, with default neural filter, selecting "None" as the profile. View the original black and white photograph at its own permanent page. | ||||
Photographer | Unknown | ||||
Source | ww2dbaseUnited States National Archives | ||||
Identification Code | 80-G-418331 | ||||
More on... |
| ||||
Photo Size | 1,394 x 1,101 pixels | ||||
Photos on Same Day | 25 Jun 1942 | ||||
Photos at Same Place | Pacific Ocean | ||||
Added By | C. Peter Chen | ||||
Colorized Date | 24 Feb 2023 | ||||
Licensing | Public Domain. According to the US National Archives, as of 21 Jul 2010: Please contact us regarding any inaccuracies with the above information. Thank you. |
Did you enjoy this photograph or find this photograph helpful? If so, please consider supporting us on Patreon. Even $1 per month will go a long way! Thank you. Share this photograph with your friends: Stay updated with WW2DB: |
Visitor Submitted Comments
2. C. Peter Chen says:
12 Sep 2014 06:48:55 AM
The US National Archives had captioned this as a Jun 1942 photograph from either USS Wahoo or USS Nautilus. Assuming the date of Jun 1942 is accurate, given that USS Wahoo had not yet gone on a war patrol (her first patrol would start in late Aug 1942), and that USS Nautilus had sunk destroyer Yamakaze on 25 Jun 1942, I deduced this photo might be from the Yamakaze sinking.
12 Sep 2014 06:48:55 AM
The US National Archives had captioned this as a Jun 1942 photograph from either USS Wahoo or USS Nautilus. Assuming the date of Jun 1942 is accurate, given that USS Wahoo had not yet gone on a war patrol (her first patrol would start in late Aug 1942), and that USS Nautilus had sunk destroyer Yamakaze on 25 Jun 1942, I deduced this photo might be from the Yamakaze sinking.
3. Craig R says:
1 Dec 2017 05:19:56 PM
I've seen this photo around over the years, and I've often wondered about whether there are Japanese sailors visible. I'll state right up front that because the photo is slightly blurred, I may be misreading details.
Having said that, there appear to my eye two vaguely human-shaped things on the destroyer's bridge and between the bridge and mast; if they ARE sailors, they seem to be clad in white.
I would assume that these things could be canvas railing covers or flags or some such, but I recall seeing this same photo (either in a book or online) with the objects edited out; perhaps 'cleaned up' to remove the human element of the ship sinking? (I cannot recall just where I'd seen that edited version; if I find out, I shall post an update.)
Anyway, am I just 'seeing things,' reading meaning into random details, or are there indeed a couple of sailors struggling to stay above water?
Either way, I would submit that this is one of the more dramatic WWII action photos taken.
1 Dec 2017 05:19:56 PM
I've seen this photo around over the years, and I've often wondered about whether there are Japanese sailors visible. I'll state right up front that because the photo is slightly blurred, I may be misreading details.
Having said that, there appear to my eye two vaguely human-shaped things on the destroyer's bridge and between the bridge and mast; if they ARE sailors, they seem to be clad in white.
I would assume that these things could be canvas railing covers or flags or some such, but I recall seeing this same photo (either in a book or online) with the objects edited out; perhaps 'cleaned up' to remove the human element of the ship sinking? (I cannot recall just where I'd seen that edited version; if I find out, I shall post an update.)
Anyway, am I just 'seeing things,' reading meaning into random details, or are there indeed a couple of sailors struggling to stay above water?
Either way, I would submit that this is one of the more dramatic WWII action photos taken.
4. Craig R says:
19 May 2018 07:38:55 AM
This photo and ANOTHER from the same sinking appear at the Naval History and Heritage Command online archive. Their first photo is the one above, but with a different reference numberâ NH111751 instead of 80-G-418331âand rotated so the horizon line is horizontal. It shows that the âhorizon lineâ is actually a long swell between Nautilusâ scope and the sinking Yamakaze, especially when viewed in reference to the second photoâŠ
That second photoâreference number NH111752âshows that Yamakazeâs back has snapped just aft of the bridge superstructure and mast, with the bow section rolling to port & sinking stern-first and the rest of the ship--from the forward funnel aft--sinking relatively even-keeled, bow-first. The mast appears to be slightly askew, although that could be because of the forward sectionâs rolling. The forward funnel definitely appears to be off-center; both funnels in this class of destroyer should be parallel to each other. At least two crewmenâclad in white uniformsâcan be seen on the stern portion standing beside the main deck rail, possibly with others around them; the photo is fairly blurry, and the other crewmenâif thatâs what they areâare wearing darker uniforms.
I donât know if direct links are allowed in these comments, but here are the pages with those two photos⊠replace âDOTâhtml at the end of each one with .html when entering them. https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nhhc-series/nh-series/NH-111000/NH-111751âDOTâhtml
https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nhhc-series/nh-series/NH-111000/NH-111752âDOTâhtml
This second photo also might help to clear up a mystery about the Yamakaze sinking noted in its Tabular Record of Movement over at combinedfleet.com. (http://www.combinedfleet.com/yamaka_tâDOTâhtm Replace âDOTâhtm with .htm) In the footnotes for the TRoM, contributor Tony Tully pointed out that the USS Nautilus log/report states that the destroyer sank by the BOW, ââŠyet the famous photograph taken with a rising sun recognition symbol on the forward turret⊠unambiguously shows her going down by the stern. It can only be concluded it was a typo. There seems no way the famous photo could have been misidentified...â
I suggest that very shortly after the TWO photographs were taken, Yamakazeâs bow sank quickly and the remaining stern section of the ship sank forward-end-first. The stern going down may have been seen in a last observation through Nautilusâ periscope, which later got recorded in the Nautilusâ report as the destroyer having sunk âby the bow.â
19 May 2018 07:38:55 AM
This photo and ANOTHER from the same sinking appear at the Naval History and Heritage Command online archive. Their first photo is the one above, but with a different reference numberâ NH111751 instead of 80-G-418331âand rotated so the horizon line is horizontal. It shows that the âhorizon lineâ is actually a long swell between Nautilusâ scope and the sinking Yamakaze, especially when viewed in reference to the second photoâŠ
That second photoâreference number NH111752âshows that Yamakazeâs back has snapped just aft of the bridge superstructure and mast, with the bow section rolling to port & sinking stern-first and the rest of the ship--from the forward funnel aft--sinking relatively even-keeled, bow-first. The mast appears to be slightly askew, although that could be because of the forward sectionâs rolling. The forward funnel definitely appears to be off-center; both funnels in this class of destroyer should be parallel to each other. At least two crewmenâclad in white uniformsâcan be seen on the stern portion standing beside the main deck rail, possibly with others around them; the photo is fairly blurry, and the other crewmenâif thatâs what they areâare wearing darker uniforms.
I donât know if direct links are allowed in these comments, but here are the pages with those two photos⊠replace âDOTâhtml at the end of each one with .html when entering them. https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nhhc-series/nh-series/NH-111000/NH-111751âDOTâhtml
https://www.history.navy.mil/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nhhc-series/nh-series/NH-111000/NH-111752âDOTâhtml
This second photo also might help to clear up a mystery about the Yamakaze sinking noted in its Tabular Record of Movement over at combinedfleet.com. (http://www.combinedfleet.com/yamaka_tâDOTâhtm Replace âDOTâhtm with .htm) In the footnotes for the TRoM, contributor Tony Tully pointed out that the USS Nautilus log/report states that the destroyer sank by the BOW, ââŠyet the famous photograph taken with a rising sun recognition symbol on the forward turret⊠unambiguously shows her going down by the stern. It can only be concluded it was a typo. There seems no way the famous photo could have been misidentified...â
I suggest that very shortly after the TWO photographs were taken, Yamakazeâs bow sank quickly and the remaining stern section of the ship sank forward-end-first. The stern going down may have been seen in a last observation through Nautilusâ periscope, which later got recorded in the Nautilusâ report as the destroyer having sunk âby the bow.â
5. Craig R says:
23 May 2018 08:35:49 AM
Just want to thank WW2DB for posting my comments, and for adding that second Yamakaze photo I provided the link to... I had never seen it before a few days ago, and was excited to share the news! I'm glad you felt that it was worth adding to the database.
23 May 2018 08:35:49 AM
Just want to thank WW2DB for posting my comments, and for adding that second Yamakaze photo I provided the link to... I had never seen it before a few days ago, and was excited to share the news! I'm glad you felt that it was worth adding to the database.
6. C. Peter Chen says:
24 May 2018 07:14:40 AM
Craig, thank you for visiting WW2DB and your comment that led to the new photo addition. I admit the guilt that I don't always get time to directly respond to every comment, but know that I do read them regularly!
24 May 2018 07:14:40 AM
Craig, thank you for visiting WW2DB and your comment that led to the new photo addition. I admit the guilt that I don't always get time to directly respond to every comment, but know that I do read them regularly!
All visitor submitted comments are opinions of those making the submissions and do not reflect views of WW2DB.
Change View
Desktop ViewSearch WW2DB
Modern Day Location
WW2-Era Place Name | Pacific Ocean |
Lat/Long | 34.4000, 140.4000 |
Random Photograph
Current Site Statistics
- » 1,150 biographies
- » 337 events
- » 43,917 timeline entries
- » 1,241 ships
- » 350 aircraft models
- » 207 vehicle models
- » 374 weapon models
- » 123 historical documents
- » 260 facilities
- » 470 book reviews
- » 28,540 photos
- » 432 maps
Famous WW2 Quote
"All right, they're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us... they can't get away this time."Lt. Gen. Lewis B. "Chesty" Puller, at Guadalcanal
7 Dec 2010 08:48:34 AM
I have the exact same picture of the jap destroyer being sunk. My Uncle was a crewmember of the nautilus during the battle of midway.That pic that I have is censored with all the details.